Independent accountability reporting
Evidence worth paying attention to.
We assemble the evidence clearly enough that readers can decide for themselves how angry they should be.
Deep primary-source reporting, competing explanations, response, aftermath and unresolved questions.
Browse Dossiers →02 / One findingA compact story whose core truth is substantially established—and verified to the same standard.
Browse Briefs →03 / What followedA live record of official action, ignored recommendations, repayments, resignations and unresolved outcomes.
Open the Ledger →An IPC adjudicator found that Environment had not justified withholding specified Eagle Gold-response records. The department rejected part of the recommendation; current disclosure and court-review status remain unconfirmed.
Quebec’s municipal watchdog could not substantiate a job that paid for almost a decade. Portage-du-Fort has now hired the former Waltham DG to manage its office.
An audit found no market-research proof in 27 of 53 representative files. Yukon calls it a documentation problem. Higher direct-award limits make that proof more important.
Selective by design
A Brief is short because the story is simple, not because the verification is.
No Brief has cleared the publication threshold yet.Dossier · Yukon
Public sources checked through September 10, 2026 do not establish whether court review occurred or the disputed records were later released.
Dossier · Waltham and Portage-du-Fort, Quebec
Waltham filed the report and later adopted explicit cheque controls, but no public CMQ record located closes the observer’s remaining work.
How we report
Public records can be technically available while remaining practically invisible. We find them, connect them and explain what they establish—and what they do not.
Read our methodology →